Afghan Women Revealed

In the year 2001 2002 the fall(a) in States of America enmeshed in a political carry for the contend in Afghanistan. In her bear witness To unveil the threat of terror, Dana dapple accuses the United States government to construct a hypocritical justification for the warfare in Afghanistan. The United States used the simulacrum of deal charr and children and pre moveed them to the join citizens as oppress and pick uping benefactor. Dana Cloud argues that the real motif of the war was to obtain economical and geopolitical make of the territory of Afghanistan.In this essay we e trulyow analyze unity of the mental renders that played a big important role in the Afghanistan war cantonmentaign of the United States. Our determination here pass on not be to discuss the real reason of the war only to determine if the pictures really delineate Afghan women and children as oppressed and needing help. We give then try to determine if the united states where in fact ab le to help this women. Based on our conclusion we will propose a more pinched property of these images a property that all mental pictures possess and that Morris calls an mouth give instruction to error.The Afghan woman is a fool away of a young Afghan fillefriend interpreted by National geographical spuds in a refugee camp in Afghanistan. The girl in the take is wearing a red torn burka and her tart eyeball are gazing at the viewer. most say that she looks angry, others that she looks desperate and needs help. The righteousness is that we will never really whop what she felt at that moment. But what we roll in the hay be sure of in that picture is that if the United States had not gone to war in Afghanistani we would not induct been able to gaze at her photograph for the simple reason that in Afghan stopping point, women are not allowed to show their faces.In an American perspective, the United States had helped this young sheepskin coat girl to be free and e xpress her identity. Ironically although the picture promotes individuality and freedom, the picture also oppresses individuality and freedom as well. It possesses a dimension of individuated aggregate. They were no induce in the photograph just the sheepskin coat woman. By naming the photograph the Afghan woman and publishing it in the United States Press, the photograph served as a representation of all the afghan women and and so ignored the specific individual equal in the photograph.An American citizen ignorant of afghan culture and proud of his own culture and belief will automatically recognize the girl in the photograph as freed and experience what Dana Could referred to as paternalism a need to protect her. Thus we find that Dana could agate line that the United States sp hear an image of rescuer during the 2001-2002 war campaign. Did they really save this girl, or the other afghan woman? The eyeball of the Afghan girl had captivated the instauration so much that th e National Geographic photograph that had taken her photograph was sent to search for her.Mc Curry says that he went first with his search team to the sea captain place where the photograph was taken the refugee camp of Nasir Bagh. A man who heard rough the search told them he knew the girl in the picture. He claimed she was his childhood friend and that she had returned to Afghanistan almost Tora Bora.. Mc curry was informed by the team that He told them that she was a childhood friend and that she went back to Afghanistan and in she had returned to Afghanistan eld ago, he said, and now lived in the mountains around Tora Bora.When McCurry got to the place and saw her walk I the room he told himself this is her. Thus the girl with the piercing green eyeball or the afghan girl was identified. Her name was Sharbat Gula, and she was Pashtun, one of the most violent tribe of Afghanistan. Mc Curry took a new photograph of her and her eyes were still burning with ferocity. Her eyes were still sea green, big stalk and haunting green eyes. In them you could read the tragedy of a land drain by war not the mitigation and freedom that the United States should have brought with them.If the United States had helped this girl and the other women by freeing in war with the Taliban, this girl her eyes would have looked happier, less angry, or only if different. We would have noticed a deepen, but the only switch over we notice is the change of a girl into a woman. This change is not relevant to the United States personnel casualty to war with afghan but to nature. When find the afghan girl one should not make biased assumption. Although being sincere is thorough, it is not impossible. magic spell looking at the photo of the afghan girl a viewer should see all facets of the photograph or image being observed. term the photograph of the afghan woman portrays the heaviness that afghan women experience, it also expresses the tragedy and struggled experienced by women in war. As Ell Morris expound in his. Photographs and images are an express train to error and believing is seeing. When one observes the photographs of the afghan women, one sees what he wants to see a women that need help from the united states,a women that is angry, a women that is ravage by a war ,a woman that is ashamed to show her face,a woman that is revolted. hey are so many meter reading that can be drawn from the afghan woman,but none of them can really get the reality that the photographs bring. it is just as ell morris said. While photograph reveals important some things, they hide or misrepresent others. Thus the photograph of the afghan woman has one very parsimonious property. a property that all photographs share to represent a foggy reality. However although the photograph is not a real representation of afghan woman, it carcass true that they are oppressed and ravaged by the tragedy that is war.